 |
Icom IC-M88 01 Compare, Reviews, Discounts.
Product: Icom IC-M88 01 Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Icom IC-M88 01
I leave it in the tray charger unit until I need it, it always performs well.
 |
Cuisinart CVR-1000 Compare, Reviews, Discounts.
Product: Cuisinart CVR-1000 Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Cuisinart CVR-1000
Our first rotisserie was an older compact Ronco with a cylindrical cooking chamber and a horizontal spit, a nice enough product that delivered shapely results -- but it was a hassle. The chicken had to be very carefully and tightly trussed, because of the side-to-side orientation of the spit. The quad spikes that made up the spit had to be very carefully centered on the bird, so that the relatively faded motor wouldn't hang up as it tried to retract the heavier side, a process complicated by though-provoking bird parts if the chicken wasn't perfectly trussed. Anything more than a 3.5-4 pound bird ran the risk of brushing up against the drip tray on every rotation, and in general, we found the whole process to be more anxiety than it was worth. We impartial didn't exercise it very often.
Enter the Cuisinart CVR-1000. Everything that was corrupt about the Ronco was apt about this one. The vertical spit, the big interior cooking plot, the ability to determine different temperature settings, even the shipshape lines and stainless exterior. The cooking process couldn't be mighty easier and more convenient. Because it's a vertical spit, you unbiased truss the legs together (or not), and coast the cavity of the bird down over the central wait on. That's it. No spellbinding metal spikes to drive through the bird, no trying to properly orient the weight of it all, no trying to match the ends of the spikes to metal sockets on another round disk. The encourage sits in the round drip tray (looks like a exiguous cake pan), and both arrive out of the oven easily. So you can state everything up on the counter, dash it true into the oven, turn it on and an hour later you have a wonderfully cooked bird.
Cleaning is a cinch. There's a polished heat reflector tedious the heating elements that unprejudiced slides accurate out. The drip tray catches all the juices, so what's left is honest a swiftly and easy wipe-down on the glass door and interior walls.
The oven sports an interior light, which is really more novelty than tool, but it's nice to be able to peer a microscopic more clearly how dismal the skin may be getting.
I try to avoid superlatives in reviews, but with products like this one, it's okay to fail sometimes. This is the best rotisserie I've owned. Performance and stunning appeal matched with fabulous ease of exhaust and convenience. I do highly recommend brining your birds before cooking. While rotisserie chickens are often juicy and flavorful without, you can waste up with some absolutely unbelievable results with. A luscious maple brine we exercise consists of 2 quarts water, 1 cup murky brown sugar, 1/2 cup soy sauce, 1/2 cup staunch maple syrup, 1/4 cup + 2 tablespoons sea salt, 5 whole cloves garlic (peeled), 4 whole bay leaves, 2 astronomical sprigs of thyme, 1 teaspoon whole sad peppercorns. Mix it together, bring it to a boil and cook it until all the sugars are dissolved. Let it chilly to room temperature before adding the bird. Refrigerate both together (bird fully submerged -- this is enough brine for one 4-4.5 pound chicken) for between 5.5 to 6 hours, then toss it in the rotisserie according to the included instructions (about an hour + 5 minutes for that sized bird) . What you'll have at the extinguish is a subtly flavored smoky sweet very juicy and flavorful bird, grand to anything you might obtain at typical groceries or rotisserie quick food places.
Love this machine, and will highly recommend it to friends and family.
This is not the Cuisinart solid construction that you knew in the 80's and 90's. It's not rickety by any means, but it falls short of the Cuisinart tradition. It cooks a favorable chicken, but if you want one more than 4 1/2 lbs it's hit or miss. The included cookbook doesn't even have a standard cooking chart for different foods. Unprejudiced recipes that call for specific weights and rubs, etc. For the seasoned rotisserie cook this will not be a quandary, but for the occasional roaster like myself you regain a two hundred dollar section of eye-candy (It does study sleek and recent) that you have to figure out the cooking times for on your acquire. One tip I glimpse often recommended here is the brining and I will go along with that. I had never brined a chicken before and I WAS amazed at the results. The cookbook does have instructions for that. I honest wish they'd done a guideline chart and it would have been a useful cooking tools for every level of chef.
The chiken you pick up after using this Cusinart is palatable. Easy to consume, easy to trim, speedy cooking and most importantly substantial results. I haven't seen a similar product on the market yet. Lets not forget about mark, which is very convenient. My friends are envious and some already ordered the same rotisserie.
 |
Makita AN942 Best Prices, Sales, Reviews, Compare.
Product: Makita AN942 Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Makita AN942
Depth of drive is awesome. No tools, objective click the dial which is conveniently located and it increments or decrements in 1 millimeter intervals.
This framer feels light for its size, yet is very noteworthy. It shoots standard nails, and I also conventional the 30 degree paslode FRH (stout round head) nails and ring shanks without assert.
Rubber grip is comfortable and the tool has rubber bumpers to protect the housing.
Not determined about the air sheet to prick the noise when decoupling the air hose, it serene seems ravishing loud to me so I don't know why they bothered with that.
I don't utilize LVL's (I rob steel) so I can't narrate on natty heavy duty wood framing, but for general purpose stuff like walls, floor joists, built-up beams I had no problems toenailing and sinking the heads, even with ringshanks.
No complaints except the high impress and it could have near with a rafter hook. I would definitely purchase it again. By the design, it needs a 3/8" NPT air fitting or you'll need a step down to exercise it with standard 1/4" air fittings.
If you're comparing to the AN922 fat round head Makita framer, a Vast incompatibility is the 922 will shoot .162 gauge nails and the 942 is small to .131 (which is typical) .
A few minutes in the tools crib and I found an adapter from Husky about a $1.50 located arrive the air compressors and 2,000 count box of GripRite GRSP12DZ for $19.97 - now off to make some walls.
The gun performed flawless through the first case of nails. No misfires and a LOT less kick befriend that my buddy's Senco. This gun is truly a one-hand spend tool, biggy in my book. The turn style impact gauge is a sweet deal, after having "genuine green" pine meander for the wall studs.
Some other nailers that spend that same nails as this framing nail gun are as follows:
Dewalt D51823
Hitachi NR83AA & NR90AA
Paslod Power Master Plus, Impulse 53005 & SK 312
Senco All Frame Pro 600 & 700 - SN325+ & SN70
33 degree paper tap nailers are the key words to locate on the box. The produce listed Plastic or Paper for the nail collation material. My comment would be that paper doesn't bounce all around after a nail is fired.
I am very, very overjoyed with this engage. I highly recommend this gun based from its performance and beget quality.
~Update~
I have tried a few flavors of framing nails manufacturers and it appears that 30 - 34 degree nails will all work in this gun. I retract the paper taped nails, nothing bounces around after firing a nail. Lowes and HomeDepot both stock a advantageous assortment of nails compatible with this model and the brand is sometimes awesome, especially when on clearance.
I purchased the AN942 to develop myself a shed. I was very delighted with the quality of the nailing gun and it's function. After landing approximately 2500 nails into the shed, there were maybe 5 nail jams -- mostly due to the type of nails I was using.
There are two things that I like the most about this nailer:
- it's weight: It is fairly light compared to other models out on the market
- the option of trigger nailing or bump nailing with the flick of a switch! Very nice. After getting primitive to the gun, bump nailing made the project depart along even faster.
My only con that I can contemplate of are:
- there is no case that comes with this gun?! Your provided w/glasses and oil. Substitute the glasses for a decent case please.
- I really wish there was a rafter hook on this gun. could gain life easier sometimes.
Also, the thread is 3/8" NPT -- so be prepared to have a reducer should you choose to bustle a 1/4"NPT line.
 |
Canon 0345B002 Christmas Discounts!.
Product: Canon 0345B002 Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Canon 0345B002
The short version:
Pros:
The optical quality is gargantuan, the rush is terrific, and it compares well to the 70-200mm lens that people like to say blows this out of the water (I absorb they are nasty - but we will fetch into that later) and finally, the stamp cannot be beaten. Remove it.
Cons:
No hood, extends as it zooms, and the quality of the describe in indecent light dwelling lessens a runt.
The long version:
I am writing this in simple terms. I found several, several reviews on this lens but they were all in technical terms and leaves you scratching your head a minute. So, if you are like me maybe this review will relieve you.
I bought this lens a couple months ago from US1Photo.com (check these guys out. They regularly have essential sales and terrific customer service) . I exhaust this lens with a Canon 40D.
I steal several types and styles of pictures so I needed a lens that would do the best job at several things and have a very affordable trace (apt at or less than $1,000) . I looked through current, faded, third party (Tamron, Sigma, etc) lenses, and read too many reviews and looked at too many images to count, and spent four hours in a photography store playing with lenses before I decided to employ money and engage advantage of this lens. All in all I spent about a week's worth of time in research and testing before I bought this lens.
---
Edit:
Okay, so amazon won't let me do a link here. This is how you secure me.
~Go to Flickr
~Then type in a "/" then "photos" then "/" and last type in "gman_five0"
And that should lift you there.
---
Test of comment #1:
~The Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM does not track keen objects very well and the farther to the destroy of the zoom the slower the tracking.
(Flickr Gallery page 2)
This, I have found, to be completely despicable. I have worn the lens at several sporting events and found that it tracks rather nicely. I was able to track every step of a base-runner from first despicable to second, bound, and recovery after the play without losing ONE shot.
To discover what I am talking about check out my gallery on Flickr. The older ones are NOT done with this lens or camera and taken, actually, several years ago. I will reference the pictures in examine.
Safe, Got There By a Mile, Breaking Up That Double Play (please label that as time goes on from the date that this was posted the pictures may have been re-moved) . Also, "Superior" was traditional instead of another shot taken at the same time and angle with a 70-200mm IS lens.
To grasp these shots I stale "AI focus" and the "H" settings on my camera for quicker tracking and the H settings for about 6 frames per second.
Test of Comment #2:
~The 200-300mm range is nice in theory, but a tack-sharp photo from the 70-200mm f/4L at 200mm is going to witness better cropped than a 300mm full-frame photo from this lens.
Again, I found this to be bad. Though I have no dependable "chunky sized" characterize for this if you comment relieve with an email address then we can arrange a viewing of one. Otherwise, bewitch my word for it, I have several lenses and this one stacks up well.
(Ref Flickr Gallery)
The pictures from the Dance Theater and Tashina were all taken at the 200-300mm focus lengths. Again, they are not bulky sized because of photo pirates, but if you email me we can eye about rotund sized shots.
Test of Comment #3:
~The IS motor is loud
I do not know what these people are talking about, but if you call that loud...
On the other hand, I have heard (once), the sound of the IS motor, but if you are not listening for it you will not even inspect it.
Things I have found about the lens:
If you utilize some time with the lens will be one of your best friends. It is a big lens especially for people on a budget (like me) . To grasp the best pictures you cannot honest twist it on and go to shooting. Recall the time to LEARN about the lens (change shutter speeds, ISO settings, aperture, white balances, etc) and it will prove you where it shines - unbiased like the L series lenses and the 70-200mm IS.
This lens has a solid manufacture and feels like it will last forever. Then again, as you zoom the lens does extend and is plastic. So, gape out if you are doing sports. You may secure it knocked off. It did well for me, though. Extending while zooming makes putting a hood on the lens a bit (very little; so dinky that you cannot notify) awkward and it looks kinda goofy.
I like the lens because it is not as burly as the 70-200mm lens and it is extremely mobile. It is as mercurial as some other lenses, not as like a flash as some, and quicker than others. It will give you astronomical quality pictures. It does have its limits, however: in grievous light situations not being able to hold it abet a couple stops and collect a wider aperture will not give you the same shot as a 70-200mm. Then again, like I said, it doesn't plunge to that f/2.8 and does not cost all that money. This has been the single drawback for me about the lens.
I spend this lens for portraits (Tashina, Samantha), for sports (gaze gallery), and music (Shawn Pander - Look Gallery) . So, it's splendid versatile. I have yet to exercise with it flash, but that is because I simply do not like to exhaust flash. I have yet to utilize it in a studio setting, but when I do I will amend this review and add a couple of those pictures as well.
This lens comes highly recommended from me. I am not a gargantuan time, highly paid, or well known photographer. I unprejudiced like to shoot and like what I shoot to be of the best quality that I can have AND afford at the time. So, if you are like me and cannot exercise the needed $1,500 - $1,700 on a 70-200mm IS lens then employ your money on this lens. You will not be sorry for it.
---
On another imprint, comments are welcome. This is my first ever review on here so let me know if there anything else that you would like to know about and I will do my best to reply the interrogate in the most insensible terms as possible.
After debating between this and the 70-200 L series I decided to lift this lens. I have been pleasantly surprised by the results. I also bear the 17-85 and the 50mm 1.8 lenses and I have found that I have gotten the "most exquisite" results from this lens. The pictures have been very fascinating from my 20D - even in the 200mm - 300mm range. I've also been tickled with the quality of the bokeh.
The famous drawback I seek is that the AF tends to hunt a handsome amount when confronted with shameful disagreement images. That being said, I stale it for some flying bird shooting at the wildlife refuge and was surprised to peek how many of the shots were in inviting focus. However, it was a dinky bit of all or nothing. Several shots were also wildly out of focus. Since the lens is fairly uninteresting to focus, you never know what you're gonna net with such a snappy spirited object against the distant sky.
I had great more consistent results when shooting soccer, softball and football in the park. The AF race did not point to an reveal for any of these activities and the results were kindly.
I wish the lens were a shrimp less expensive but I the prints I have gotten from my 13 X 19 printer have been worth the extra money.
I bought this lens as a replacement for the earlier 75-300mm IS lens. I was generally glad with that lens, but it had clear limitations - I needed to shoot at f8 or f11 and bump up the ISO to bag a decent shutter hurry.
This original version seems enchanting at pudgy zoom even wide commence, allowing me to exhaust a lower ISO setting. Size is similar to older version, but the IS seems more effective - looking through the lens when it kicks in you can actually sight the image become more stable and less shaky. I got this over the Canon 70-200 f4 L because of the extra near, smaller size (slightly) and the images I've seen from both are very similar.
UPDATE: There have been reports of soft images when using this lens in a verticle orientation - however I have not experienced this on my copy. I'm gay to say that after months of using this lens, I collected contemplate it mammoth.
 |
Asus 1101HA-MU1X-BK Best Prices!.
Product: Asus 1101HA-MU1X-BK Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Asus 1101HA-MU1X-BK
The Asus eee 1101 is Asus's first foray into the "bridge" gap between 10" netbooks and 12" laptops, and has a shapely number of strengths and a few weaknesses.
A few differences between this and the ASUS Eee PC 1005HA-PU1X-BK 10.1-Inch Murky Netbook - 10.5 Hour Battery Life:
* The 1101HA has a slightly slower processor (1.33 Ghz) versus 1.66 Ghz. You're able to overclock it to execute up for that performance loss, however.
* The LCD on the 1101HA is is 720p (1366x768), but anything running at 720p will most likely overtax the CPU and produce it a awful viewing experience. Even playing Quicktime mp4 (720p) with a 5mbps bit rate had frame dropping.
* Awesome battery life. Laptop Magazine reported nearly 9 hours of battery life on their torture test but it hit 7.5 hours in my test of WiFi + movie playing.
The main competition is the Acer Aspire One AO751h-1893 11.6-Inch Gloomy Netbook - 8 Hour Battery Life, which has a slightly smaller pricetag to match the slightly less battery runtime. But it also includes Vista, a bigger hard drive and more memory. So, on the dawn of Windows 7's release date, having Vista would originate the upgrade process to Windows 7 slightly easier. Even though I've had mixed experience with the Acer price, it represents a better value than the 1101HA.
The spot that if you were to shop for a netbook today, you're almost innundated with choices. There are too many to determine from, and there's not one that stands out from the rest. The Asus 1101HA is an tremendous netbook, but it doesn't invent the decision easier to decide between this and the Acer A0751h.
When my wife wanted suggestions about what novel laptop to hold, I suggested this netbook. I recommended it because it had an SVGA+ reveal (1366 x 768 pixels) and amazingly long battery life. The veil and battery have not disappointed us.
However, we have noticed three major difficiencies in this netbook.
First, the speakers are honest abominable. There is no bass whatsoever, and the midrange is comely nonexistent as well. Frankly, I cannot own to listen to music played on this netbook. I have gone into the Realtek equalizer and cranked the bass and dropped the high-end frequencies. It unruffled sounds poor.
Second, the touchpad buttons are a rocker, not separate buttons. This means that you must press on the outside edges of the rocker in order to click. Which means your thumb has to move a long diagram to switch between upright and left clicks. I come by this a sincere hassle. I have to proceed my whole hand to switch between buttons. This is lousy from an ergonomic standpoint.
Third, I did not know when I recommended this netbook to my wife that the CPU is designed to only perceive up to 1GB of RAM! I had planned to add another 1GB in order to improve performance and multitasking ability.
I currently possess a different ASUS netbook myself -- a 1000HE ASUS Eee PC 1000HE 10.1-Inch Shadowy Netbook - 9.5 Hour Battery Life. I cherish it, except for its tiny mask resolution (1024x600) . Its speakers are vastly first-rate to those in the 1101HA. Music sounds astronomical on the 1000HE. Also, the Atom N280 CPU in the 1000HE sees the 2GB of RAM I place in the machine.
I have one last complaint that applies to both the 1000HE and the 1101HA. It is that both these netbooks have wireless cards built in that only befriend the 2.4 GHz ISM band. This band is also obsolete by microwave ovens, cordless phones and bluetooth. This means that the range and hasten of the wireless connection is often degraded by interference. Newer 802.11n cards wait on the 5 GHz ISM band. Some cards even relieve combining the bandwidth in both the 2.4 and 5 GHz bands. I am planning to have my next laptop/netbook encourage the 5 GHz band.
Aside from these complaints, both the ASUS 1000HE and 1101HA are colossal netbooks!
I hope this helps you retract the best acquire for you.
If you are looking for a Netbook with a gargantuan shroud, astounding battery life, solid obtain quality, I highly recommend the 1101HA from ASUS. I have been using mine for a exiguous over a month, and am so far very contented. I exercise this both to fair surf the web when I am kicked assist on the coach, and when I move as my considerable system. I depart very frequently, gone are the days when I have to speed around the airport trying to earn an outlet. I can establish in a solid 8 hour day and unbiased 'forget' to rush the system in for power. It doesn't compare to my x301 thinkpad, but that is a $2K different class of system (this is a netbook, not a notebook) . The 1101HA has an overdrive feature, that coupled with the built in Atom extensions for HD really boost performance when you want to glance movies, or have an intensive application (editing a gargantuan presentation) .
If you are deployed this is a broad choice, I would have been really contented to have had this the last time I was in the desert. It comes with a padded pouch, unprejudiced throw it in your ruck and forget about it. Miniature enough to carry around, broad enough to employ.
Pros:
1. The veil is 11.6", not the standard hurry of the mill 10". More importantly it has a higher resolution than most netbooks out there at 1366 x 768.
2. Nice keyboard size for a netbook, feels well made, and allows me to type at run.
3. Button to turn off the beget in mouse-pad if your using a bluetooth (or any) mouse.
4. Bluetooth, definitely a sure, I have paired this to my earpiece to consume with my softphone (or skype etc) .
5. Mammoth battery life.
6. Really nice beget quality, looks enormous.
Cons:
Not noteworthy really, I never write reviews, it has to really be unbiased that obedient to motivate me. The fingerprints left on the gloss conclude don't bother me, especially since ASUS provided a special cloth designed for that. The only genuine grip I have is that there is not external access to the hard drive, if you want to build an SSD in this system, you have to crack this sucker commence (not for the faint of heart) .
If you are going to upgrade the memory to 2GB, you need to steal specific versions or it will disable the over-clocking feature. The ASUS assist sit lists the memory modules that are know to work.
Linux: If you don't consume Linux, that's it, if you do read on..
I utilize Fedora, assuming that other distros will have similar results. Installed Fedora 11, you will need to add the plousbo yum repo for the GMA500 that Will Adam from Red Hat is driving. I bought the Fluendo codecs, they have a specific version to benefit the Atom that takes advantage of the hardware decoders. To manipulate the over-clocking feature you simply echo values to /proc, google it 
. Outside of that, it honest worked, webcam, bluetooth, etc.
